Becoming an Android developer on the Play Store presents numerous challenges. It’s not just about building a reputation and attracting app downloads; you must also navigate the unpredictable and sometimes devastating impact of Play Store policy enforcement. Unfortunately, many developers who genuinely strive to adhere to the rules have experienced the sudden removal of their apps from the platform. The latest victim of what appears to be an unfair removal is an app accused of supporting piracy solely due to the inclusion of a web browser.
Downloader, a popular Android TV app, addresses a significant issue power users face: the seamless transfer of files to these devices, particularly for sideloading apps. Among its features, the app includes a web browser optimized for remote usage, enabling users to retrieve files from websites conveniently. Essentially, Downloader does what its name suggests.
The predicament originates from a law firm representing multiple Israeli TV companies, which filed a Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) complaint with Google, as reported by Ars Technica. The firm asserts that the app can access a piracy website, alleging numerous people exploit it to obtain content without payment. However, the app’s developer, Elias Saba, vehemently denies affiliation with the piracy website. He asserts that his app solely directs users to the homepage of his website, AFTVnews, without leading them elsewhere.
Saba filed an appeal soon after receiving the DMCA complaint through the Play Console. However, Google swiftly rejected his request within an hour. Undeterred, he submitted a second appeal using Google’s DMCA counter-notification form. He awaits a response, with the latest update on his request occurring earlier today. Regrettably, Saba lacks visibility into the specific changes made, but it indicates that progress has been made since he initially submitted the form last Friday.
In a series of tweets, Saba highlights the inconsistency of taking down a browser merely because it can load a pirated website. He argues that if this were the case, all browsers within the Google Play Store should face removal. He expresses disappointment in Google’s passive approach, hoping they would implement measures to filter out baseless DMCA notices like the one he received.
Google has yet to reinstate the app, leaving the outcome uncertain for Saba’s arguments. While it is reasonable to envision the app’s return, given its similarity to other browsers available on the Play Store, nothing guarantees its reinstatement. Google has previously reinstated apps following DMCA claims, but even with a valid counter-notice, the resolution process can still extend for months before rectification is achieved.